At our Agenda Setting meeting, we discussed the plan for cutting off many, many streetlights across our community. This plan was agreed to as a cost-saving measure during our mini-budget crisis. As an added bonus, it also is an energy conservation measure. As the article indicates, some of us expressed some concerns about the process. I asked that we just cut off power to the lights but not remove them for some fixed period of time so that we can assess any severe negatives for particular locations.
Keep in mind that these are not our lights - they belong to Georgia Power. But they have indicated they are willing to work with us. Others voiced concerns about turning off light in high crime areas. These were just execution concerns, not concerns about the entire concept of cutting off the lights, which is why this editorial is the most inane, unfounded, misleading, and mean spirited thing i have read in the paper in a while.
It starts with “Actions have consequences, and it's a bit disturbing that Athens-Clarke County commissioners apparently don't have a grasp of that self-evident proposition.” For anyone who was at the meeting, it is clear that everyone grasps that quite well, and we were merely looking to make sure the lights-off made the least impact on safety possible. That is our duty as elected officials. Commissioner Lynn was merely making the point that maybe we could add crime stats to our list of criteria for selecting the lights to remove.
Maybe that will not work out and maybe it is not possible, but it was a very responsible question to ask and it did not deserve the wrath of that editorial.